000 04348cam a2200361 a 4500
001 16602935
003 PIPS
005 20250926121559.0
008 110107s2011 enka b 001 0 eng
010 _a 2011000635
016 7 _a015794402
_2Uk
020 _a9780521190602 (hardback)
020 _a0521190606 (hardback)
035 _a(OCoLC)ocn696321889
040 _aDLC
_cPIPS
_dYDX
_dYDXCP
_dBWK
_dUKMGB
_dCDX
_dDLC
042 _apcc
050 0 0 _aK2146
_b.J855 2011
082 0 0 _a347.014
_222
_bLEE-J 949
084 _aLAW016000
_2bisacsh
100 _aH. P. Lee
_eEditor
245 0 0 _aJudiciaries in comparative perspective /
_cedited by H.P. Lee.
260 _aCambridge, UK ;
_aNew York :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2011.
300 _alvi, 567 p. :
_bill. ;
_c24 cm.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 8 _aMachine generated contents note: Part I: 1. Judicial independence and accountability: core values in liberal democracies Shimon Shetreet; Part II: 2. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in Australia H. P. Lee; 3. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in Canada Martin Friedland; 4. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in New Zealand Philip Joseph; 5. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in South Africa Hugh Corder; 6. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges -- fundamental reforms in the United Kingdom Kate Malleson; 7. Judicial selection, removal and discipline in the United States Mark Tushnet; Part III: 8. Judges' freedom of speech: Australia John Williams; 9. Judges and free speech in Canada Kent Roach; 10. Judges and free speech in New Zealand The Hon. Grant Hammond; 11. The judiciary and freedom of speech in South Africa Iain Currie; 12. Judges and free speech in the United Kingdom Keith Ewing; 13. The criticism and speech of judges in the United States Charles Gardner Geyh; Part IV: 14. Judges, bias and recusal in Australia Colin Campbell; 15. Judges, bias and recusal in Canada Lorne Soissin; 16. Judicial recusal in New Zealand Gerard McCoy; 17. Judges, bias and recusal in South Africa The Hon. Kate O'Regan and The Hon. Edwin Cameron; 18. Judges, bias and recusal in the United Kingdom Christopher Forsyth; 19. Bias, the appearance of bias, and judicial disqualification in the United States W. W. Hodes; Part V: 20. Judges and non-judicial functions in Australia Patrick Emerton and H. P. Lee; 21. The impact of extra-judicial service on the Canadian judiciary: the need for reform Patrick Monahan and Byron Shaw; 22. Judges and the non-judicial function in New Zealand Sir Geoffrey Palmer; 23. Judges and non-judicial functions in South Africa Cora Hoexter; 24. Judges and non-judicial functions in the United Kingdom Abimbola Olowofoyeku; 25. Judges and non-judicial functions in the United States Jeffrey M. Shaman; Part VI: 26. The judiciary -- a comparative conspectus H. P. Lee.
520 _a"An independent and impartial judiciary is fundamental to the existence and operation of a liberal democracy. Focussing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States, this comparative study explores four major issues affecting the judicial institution. These issues relate to the appointment and discipline of judges; judges and freedom of speech; the performance of non-judicial functions by judges; and judicial bias and recusal, and each is set within the context of the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The essays highlight important episodes or controversies affecting members of the judiciary to illustrate relevant principles"--
_cProvided by publisher.
520 _a"The study of judicial independence is important in national legal systems as it is an essential guarantee for democracy and liberty. Judicial independence is also an essential feature in ensuring a globalised economy. Corporations must have confidence in the impartiality and independence of the tribunals that will adjudicate disputes in the multiple jurisdictions in which they operate around the world"--
_cProvided by publisher.
650 0 _aJudges.
700 1 _aLee, H. P.,
_d1947-
906 _a7
_bcbc
_corignew
_d1
_eecip
_f20
_gy-gencatlg
942 _2ddc
_cBK
999 _c1272
_d1272